Judges may be incompetent, corrupt or lazy.
Even worse, many are political opportunists with a political agenda. They are “judicial activists.” A judicial activist legislates from the bench. Instead of strictly interpreting the law, these judges make the laws. Instead of applying the law to facts, they impose their own values on us all.
It is the voters and the legislatures that are supposed to make laws. Not judges. In fact, these judges ignore the law in favor or their own ideological, Pro-Socialist, anti-family agendas.
Legislating from the bench, these judges destroy or weaken constitutional protection, votes by the people, family values, religious liberty and economic freedom.
The best candidate. Our strongest endorsement.
Vote only to prevent worse candidate(s) from winning
Horrible candidate. Terrible. Do Not Vote. All your other votes will count.
How we come up with a final rating
We recommend you vote for candidates that have the highest rating.
How We Research and Rate the Candidates
Judicial Index (JI)
American Bar Association ratings
here are the outrageous things judicial activists have done
Imposed their moral codes
Imposed their own moral codes, political beliefs and secular values in an effort to reshape our society and promote social engineering.
INSTEAD, ACTIVIST JUDGES HAVE BEEN ADVANCING A POLITICAL AGENDA THAT
Destroys the separation of powers
Weakens the structure of federalism
Usurps the right of the people to govern themselves
Undermines protection of religious freedoms and the First Amendment
Seeks to impose their personal beliefs on certain issues, regardless of law
Is biased against free enterprise and is anti-growth—resulting in higher taxes and regulations, fewer jobs and less opportunity for our future
PURE AND SIMPLE, IT’S POLITICS FROM THE BENCH.
Stay Informed on the Latest Judicial News that effects Your Liberties
Alameda County Superior Court Judge Kelli Evans nominated to California Supreme Court. Critics assert that she is inexperienced and unqualified.
California Governor Gavin Newsome has nominated Associate Justice Patricia Guerrero as the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court upholds universal mail-in voting. The five Democratic-appointed justices split from the two Republican-appointed justices in preserving the law.
Nick Sandmann, the Kentucky student who vilified due to a viral video showing him in a standoff with an indigenous activist at the Lincoln Memorial, had his defamation suit dismissed by a federal judge.
Here are the 5 astounding Supreme Court victories that help preserve individual and religious liberties and restrict bureaucratic tyranny. These 5 court victories are historic and the socialist/secularist heads are spinning.
While New York City’s law to allow noncitizens to vote was struck down in the courts, 14 U.S. jurisdictions have similar laws. With all the talk of voter integrity, these laws undermine the will of American citizens and dilute their voice.
Upon examining Articles II and IX of the State Constitution, Judge Porzio added that “it is clear to this Court that voting is a right granted to citizens of the United States,” and thus the city law granting the right to noncitizens violates the constitution.
Judgeships are one of the most important offices and judges don’t want voter to know who they really are. Voters are asked to vote for judges that have almost limitless power over various aspects of their lives.
What others are saying about
Judge Voter Guide
“Thanks for this important guide. Voting for judges is like Russian roulette. Nothing is ever printed about them except for where they went to school affiliations and so forth.”
“I just wanted you to know that I printed out (for those without a computer) and emailed your recommendations to many friends at church who always look to me for judicial recommendations. THANK YOU!”
“Thanks very much for all you’re doing. I really appreciate your recommendation on judges. I vote no unless I know something about judges.”